In this case, CAAF considers whether courts-martial defendants have a right to a unanimous guilty verdict under the Sixth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause, or the Fifth Amendment component of equal protection.
Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School on Facebook (tjaglcs), LinkedIn (tjaglcs), or visit our website for more resources at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/leapp
You can also connect directly with the Criminal Law Department on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)
| Date Taken: | 09.27.2023 |
| Date Posted: | 09.27.2023 10:23 |
| Category: | Newscasts |
| Audio ID: | 76577 |
| Filename: | 2309/DOD_109908239.mp3 |
| Length: | 00:27:50 |
| Location: | US |
| Web Views: | 7 |
| Downloads: | 0 |
| High-Res. Downloads: | 0 |
This work, The Quill & Sword | CAAF Chats Ep 22: U.S. v. Anderson (C.A.A.F 2023), must comply with the restrictions shown on https://www.dvidshub.net/about/copyright.
