These two cases examine the CAAF’s jurisdiction when deciding on writs filed by SVCs. Specifically, the CAAF decides whether they have the authority to review decisions made by the CCA’s when asked by an accused, and by an SVC, respectively.
Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School on Facebook (tjaglcs), LinkedIn (tjaglcs), or visit our website for more resources at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/leapp
You can also connect directly with the Criminal Law Department on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)
| Date Taken: | 10.12.2023 |
| Date Posted: | 10.12.2023 10:39 |
| Category: | Newscasts |
| Audio ID: | 76874 |
| Filename: | 2310/DOD_109934462.mp3 |
| Length: | 00:28:01 |
| Location: | US |
| Web Views: | 9 |
| Downloads: | 0 |
| High-Res. Downloads: | 0 |
This work, The Quill & Sword | CAAF Chats Ep 22: Fink v. Y.B. and U.S. & M.W. v. U.S. (C.A.A.F 2023), must comply with the restrictions shown on https://www.dvidshub.net/about/copyright.
