In this episode we examine CAAF's analysis concerning how and when a statement qualifies under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rules and whether appellant's conviction is legally sufficient.
Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School on Facebook (tjaglcs), LinkedIn (tjaglcs), or visit our website for more resources at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/leapp
You can also connect directly with the Criminal Law Department on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)
| Date Taken: | 12.13.2023 |
| Date Posted: | 12.13.2023 15:41 |
| Category: | Newscasts |
| Audio ID: | 77876 |
| Filename: | 2312/DOD_110045223.mp3 |
| Length: | 00:17:56 |
| Location: | US |
| Web Views: | 6 |
| Downloads: | 0 |
| High-Res. Downloads: | 0 |
This work, Criminal Law Department Presents – CAAF Chats Ep 27: United States v. Smith (C.A.A.F 2023), must comply with the restrictions shown on https://www.dvidshub.net/about/copyright.
