This week we examine CAAF’s latest decision concerning implied bias and challenging a panel member for cause. Specifically, we discuss how a judge’s determination for implied bias is reviewed, what role the liberal grant mandate plays in the decision, and what practitioners can do to better shape/argue these challenges.
Learn more about The Quill & Sword series of podcasts by visiting our podcast page at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/thequillandsword. The Quill & Sword show includes featured episodes from across the JAGC, plus all episodes from our four separate shows: “Criminal Law Department Presents” (Criminal Law Department), “NSL Unscripted” (National Security Law Department), “The FAR and Beyond” (Contract & Fiscal Law Department) and “Hold My Reg” (Administrative & Civil Law Department). Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School by visiting our website at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/ or on Facebook (tjaglcs), Instagram (tjaglcs), or LinkedIn (school/tjaglcs).
Date Taken: | 09.26.2024 |
Date Posted: | 09.26.2024 10:45 |
Category: | Newscasts |
Audio ID: | 82676 |
Filename: | 2409/DOD_110585783.mp3 |
Length: | 00:27:52 |
Location: | US |
Web Views: | 9 |
Downloads: | 0 |
High-Res. Downloads: | 0 |
This work, The Quill & Sword | CAAF Chats Ep 44: United States v. Keago (C.A.A.F. 2024), must comply with the restrictions shown on https://www.dvidshub.net/about/copyright.